How Humans read. Interesting.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmortantt!
Can you read this above passage? ;P
Can you read this above passage? ;P
cool!! look at this!!
http://elesstia.blogdrive.com/archive/14.html
I POSTED THIS IN 2003!! bwahaha.. managed to dig it out... same theory too.. =P
Posted by Anonymous | Mon Oct 24, 12:27:00 AM
omg. jonquil31! exact same passage!
oei cloviz. this is a proven research by cambridge to test how humans read ok. what kindergarden. Chey.
Posted by candice | Mon Oct 24, 01:18:00 AM
omg... i could read it.
woah.. cham cham.. neber realized tat my england drop until this kinds standard ^_~
Posted by Anonymous | Mon Oct 24, 10:44:00 AM
haha! if u cannot read it then cham!
Posted by candice | Mon Oct 24, 11:54:00 AM
i think u need to use coding theory to decode it. =P
Posted by Anonymous | Tue Oct 25, 01:39:00 AM
coding theory is nightmare. enumeration is nightmare.
in short, math2302 is nightmare.
Posted by candice | Wed Oct 26, 04:08:00 AM