« Home | Another boring day » | A boring day. » | PIR & KTV! » | My groupmates » | Yummy yummy » | No more sOa » | Hyde » | No more essays » | Oooo. Happy Founder's Day » | I'm awake, I'm awake » 

Sunday, October 23, 2005 

How Humans read. Interesting.

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmortantt!

Can you read this above passage? ;P

cool!! look at this!!

http://elesstia.blogdrive.com/archive/14.html

I POSTED THIS IN 2003!! bwahaha.. managed to dig it out... same theory too.. =P

omg. jonquil31! exact same passage!

oei cloviz. this is a proven research by cambridge to test how humans read ok. what kindergarden. Chey.

omg... i could read it.

woah.. cham cham.. neber realized tat my england drop until this kinds standard ^_~

haha! if u cannot read it then cham!

i think u need to use coding theory to decode it. =P

coding theory is nightmare. enumeration is nightmare.
in short, math2302 is nightmare.

Post a Comment